For a convention I didn't go to, I certainly have a lot to say about it....
There's been at least one post complaining about the process of voting for the the Hugo Awards. And of course, at least one response to that complaint. However, IMHO it sounds rather hypocritical to make a post being depressed about Hugo voting numbers and then make sarcastic remarks about a fan (who are the people that conventions are for) who doesn't like the process.
Maybe it's not the process that's broken, but rather letting people know about it. I think when fewer than 10% of the people vote on the Hugos, the validity of the award starts to crumble. Why don't more people vote for the Hugos? I don't know. I've certainly taken the time now and again to complain about the Hugos. I think it's ridiculous that so few people vote for the award. Perhaps it's just that the fans aren't the ones who care about the award and it's the professionals who care. What does it say when more people go to the Hugo ceremony than vote for the award. Should you have to provide a completed ballot to be able to attend the awards? Maybe they should give everyone a 10% off coupon to the dealer's room for a completed Hugo ballot. I wish more people voted, much less nominated. One step at a time, I guess.
Yes, William Lexner is new to the field, but that's good. And yes, he has some basic facts wrong (e.g., only about 10% of Worldcon memberships are bought at the door, not half). We want these people to stick around. We want people to come in and question things. I think William has some interesting ideas about the awards. Since their tablated on a computer these days (right?) there's no reason to not have Hugo voting be open later and longer. I have to argue with only having voting at the convention, though. I pay for my supporting membership so that I can nominate for the Hugos, vote for the Hugos, and vote on site selection. I can't always go to the Hugos. I suppose you could have secure online voting during the convention dates. That might work. And to quote him:
Now I've heard it said that this implausible because the Hugo Awards themselves must be engraved in advance of the event. If this is the height of the argument against technological advance and across-the-board fairness and equality by the Old Guard, then I'll happily sink that laughable argument.Responses to William's criticism of the Hugos take on a 'it's tradition' and 'we've always done it this way' air to me, and that's dangerous. Nothing makes me want to break and change things quicker than hearing 'we've always done it this way' or 'it's tradition.' That just means you're lazy.
Make up engraved plates for all of the nominees. I am reasonably certain that with the 3000+ engineers and rocket scientists in attendance, we could manage to rivet them onto the cute little rocket ships. Hell, I bet one of our numerous PhD.'s could even handle engraving tools.
I mean, c'mon, we made a change to the Best Editor award (which reads to me like a bunch of book editors were sick and tired of getting passed over for magazine editors). But whatever, I think it's too bad that book editors get overlooked for this award (except this year, the only living book editor to receive the award, congrats David!). It will be nice for Jim Baen to win the first Best Book Editor Hugo next year, since sentimentality will give him all the votes.
Here's my question, though. You've made separate categories for Editor. Now, who's going to tell all the fans (you know, the two who vote) who edited what? Patrick Nielsen Hayden made a nice entry on his web page to tell what he's worked on. What about the rest of you? I know who a lot of the editors are, but does your average fan?
To that end, I've created a wiki to help out with the Best Editor Hugo Awards.
http://besteditorhugo.pbwiki.com
It's very bare right now. I'm going to incorporate Patrick's info shortly. Then I'll hit up some other people and get their info on the page. Yes, it looks like a vanity site since I'm the only editor with any content (and Lou's up there since I didn't want the beginning of the alphabet to be empty), but I will be adding content. Like I say on the wiki, I hope this will become something that others will take initiative on and put up information. It could be editors, authors, observant fans, etc. We can create links to editor's blogs and home pages, links to author's pages, links to publishers, etc. This could be a very cool thing. Or we could all grow tired of it and stop in a week or two. Please chose the former.
Tags: Science Fiction, Electric Velocipede, Worldcon, Hugo Voting










